When the cost goes down, Biden’s climate goals remain difficult.

By MATHEW DALY – Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) – In the midst of the legislative grid that President Joe Biden has set aside for $ 2 trillion in social and environmental initiatives package, by 2030, the continent will have a steep path to achieve its goal of halving greenhouse gas emissions.

Biden’s Build Back Better plan, which costs $ 550 billion and includes tax credits, has been criticized by West Virginia Democratic Senator Joe Manchin, who is seeking to expand clean energy.

Democrats say they are moving forward with a package that strengthens family services, health care, and other programs. Manchini noted in recent days that climate-related supplies are less likely to be breached, but the bill has been a backbone for voter rights laws and other democratic priorities.

Even if the law does not exist, Biden can follow the climate agenda with rules and regulations. But, as Biden repeats, the Trump administration’s repeal of the protections under Barack Obama’s protections could be reversed by future presidents.

People are also reading…

Experts cite the broad authority of the Biden Executive Authority and the federal government to approve renewable energy projects on federal lands and waters, as well as to control emissions from cars and trucks, as well as to control emissions from power plants and other industrial sources.

In fact, the Environmental Protection Agency announced new tape rules for cars and trucks the day after the December 19 bombing. The next day, the Department of Homeland Security announced that it had approved two major solar projects in California and moved to open up public lands. In the West’s efforts to change climate change from fossil fuels, other Western nations are turning to solar energy.

The administration has the potential to raise tens of billions of dollars under a bilateral infrastructure law passed in November, including the creation of national electric chargers, including $ 7.5 billion; $ 5 billion to deliver thousands of electric school buses nationwide; And $ 65 billion to reduce power outages and expand renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power.

“In the next decade, I think the United States will have a lot of tools and a lot of options to make a profit on the climate,” said John Larson, an energy system expert and Rhodium Group independent research partner.

“It’s better to build backwards to achieve Biden’s goals,” but that does not mean that nothing will happen if you do not get better. ‘

Larson, co-author of a study of the Rodium Group last fall, said the approval of a better package, bilateral infrastructure law, and key federal agencies and states would reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions from 45 percent to 51 percent. Below 2005 in 2030.

Biden’s account provides technological advances, wind and solar farm construction and other supplies for electric vehicle purchases, carbon emissions and storage.

According to Penn State Climate Scientist Michael Mann, world leaders made progress at the Winter Summit in Scotland in November. “And for the United States to do its part, we need a better construction climate to pass Congress as quickly as possible.”

Jesse Jenkins, an energy system engineer at Princeton University, who led the effort to simulate the impact on US emissions, said there is a “yawning gap” between where US emissions are today and what we need to hit. They are President Biden’s climate targets.

“Such a gap cannot be bridged by executive action or state policy alone,” Jenkins said in an email. The Princeton model estimates that the United States will reduce its carbon footprint by 1.3 billion tons. Build a better law.

The equivalent of carbon dioxide is derived from coal and petroleum fires and other industrial uses and agriculture. .

Still, Jenkins is optimistic about American climate change.

“I reject the idea that the package is dead,” he wrote. Democrats.

“The consequences of defeat are unbearable, and the weather is moving in one direction,” Jenkins said.

Senator Tina Smith, De-Min. But she says these devices alone are not enough to meet Biden’s climate goals. Both Biden and former President Donald Trump have repeatedly stated that laws in one administration can be repealed in the next.

Trump has drafted dozens of laws from the International Paris Climate Agreement that were passed by the former Obama Democrats. Biden, meanwhile, has been pushing for a reversal of Trump’s stance, ranging from resuming the Paris Agreement to canceling the Keystone XL oil pipeline and ending new oil and gas leases on federal land and water.

By signing an executive order to make the government carbon-neutral by 2050 and by turning it into a full-fledged electric car and truck group by 2035, Biden raised the issue of climate change against the US government.

However, Biden’s efforts can only go ahead without congressional support.

“The regulatory authority will not replace congressional action,” Smith said. “That’s why it is so important that we approve the strongest possible budget and that is what we are focused on doing.”

Approving clean energy investments will reduce US greenhouse gas emissions by 5 billion tons of carbon dioxide by 2030, he said. A.D. In 2005, emissions were halved.

The chairman of the Senate Energy Committee and the state economist said Manchin, which is based on energy production, could support a number of climate projects, including some tax credits. It also wants to raise money to promote nuclear power and control industrial emissions.

“I think we can come to an agreement on something much simpler than anything else,” he said on Tuesday.

Democrats in the 50-50 Senate want all votes to advance the Republican primary.

AP science writer Borenstein contributed to this story.

Copyright 2022 Associated Press. all rights reserved. This article may not be published, distributed, republished, or redistributed.


Leave a Comment