How technology has made the American military its worst enemy.

Photo courtesy of Louis G. Renden / The Daily Beast; Getty

Nothing like modern technology has changed the face of modern warfare. Martin van Craweld, a renowned Israeli historian, wrote: “Technology is like a stone’s throw away from war. It is very strong at the point of contact; As waves spread, they become weaker and less visible. Each time they left, they would lose their identity by mixing with the waves of other rocks. ”

Well-known military historians say that revolutionary technologies influenced war between 1815, the end of Napoleonic War, and the end of World War II in 1945. A.D. Muscat, armed in the 1830s, described the beginning of the end with strict tactics such as the Roman Widgets and Napoleonic columns, as well as brightly colored uniforms depicting Western wars. A.D. In the 1860s, repeated gunpowder charges were obsolete, but the American Civil War generals did not realize this, and the result was heavy casualties.

How Klauswitz created modern warfare

A.D. The most widely used cannon shells used in the 1850s were the collapse of two ancient and prestigious military installations: a fortress and a wooden ship. However, it took more than 20 years and many other non-military technologies to be developed before the advent of modern steel naval vessels. All of these are the products of the British Industrial Revolution, steam steam engine, steam engine and large steel production.

Two other industrial revolution innovations expanded the scope of the war. Railroad and telegraph commanders allowed large numbers of troops and equipment to move to the battlefield and for the first time to monitor the scattered troops and divisions. In the Gettysburg generals, Med and Lee led some 200,000 fighters. A.D. In 1916, more than 3 million soldiers clashed with the Som On the West Front. During the 140 days of the war, one million people were injured, and the result was the same.

According to the legendary new weapon technology history, Fire power By Paul de Lockhart Deep, rapid, and even radical change in weaponry, with the help of brilliant engineers, great advances in chemistry and physics, and perhaps most of all – government-sponsored arms race have done whatever it takes to steal from its enemies, neighbors, and rivals.

At the end of the “War to End All Wars”, three new weapons emerged: a tank, a fighter jet and a Torpedo submarine. Top strategists and commanders had to deal with land, sea, and air campaigns at the same time. However, when the pistol was silent in 1918, the military capabilities of the tank and the aircraft were not clear. Tank compartments with motorized and reinforced air cover. It was said. Blitzkrig. The Germans had won most of the wars in Western Europe in nine months. Although some 400,000 British troops were stationed in France, the campaign against their arch-enemy France lasted only six weeks.

The United States quickly emerged as the “Arsenal Arsenal” in its fight against the Axis powers, and the war was stopped by producing more ships, planes and tanks than any other ally. Use of unimaginable destructive atomic weapons. The United States has spent billions on bomb production. Shortly after the war, the international consensus was that nuclear weapons should not be used again, as atomic exchanges could quickly destroy history.

Cold War When it took shape in the mid-1940s, the US military was still internationally recognized as the most powerful and technologically advanced force in the world. This is still true of China’s remarkable military development. The Pentagon spends billions of dollars every year on technology research and development to defeat its opponents, taking as little damage as possible. Since the beginning of the Cold War, the US military and its policymakers have shown a strong and relentless tendency to seek technological solutions to strategic or strategic innovations, or new challenges on the battlefield. An in-depth study of the culture and methods of the enemy.

Interestingly, Washington’s desire to find solutions to military problems goes a long way in explaining why the United States has a bad history of warfare since the catastrophic Vietnam disaster. Our failures there, and in Lebanon (1983), Somalia (1993), and in Afghanistan and Iraq, both the policy makers and the generals of the military are ignorant of the political dynamics, cultures, and ways of struggle.

In countries where civil wars, guerrilla warfare, and lawlessness have ravaged the country, raw materials and technology have often been more than a solution. Destroying enemy forces. According to Professor Carnes Lord of the College of Naval Warfare, these conflicts differ not in the degree of violence but in the political nature of the conflict. Low-intensity warfare differs from other wars not only in terms of political strategy but also in terms of military operations and tactics.

Top US political and military officials have joined the fray, believing that technology and firefighting will prevail. does not. Indeed, it was a commodity to think honestly and objectively about the nature of these conflicts before and after the determination of the powers that be. All of this gives credence to the historian Max Boot’s argument War made new “Technology alone does not provide an insurmountable military edge. Even though a country has to figure out how to use its military force, it still needs to know the capabilities and limitations of its weapons.

The history of US military deployment off the coast of Vietnam has, for the most part, been largely a dream come true, with our technological prowess blinding confident military leaders, national security advisers, and generals. To bring about political change in Asia, the Middle East and Africa.

In short, for the past half century, the United States’ extraordinary military force has been severely squandered by fighting in the wrong places.

Read more on The Daily Beast.

Submit the Daily Beast’s biggest scams and scams directly to your inbox. Sign up now.

Get information and get unlimited access to the Daily Beast unlimited report. Sign up now.

Leave a Comment